HOME ǀ SEARCH ǀ SUBMIT ǀ CONTACT US
|

Looking for a GOOD solicitor?
Let us search for you – CLICK HERE.
| Search by Area |
|---|
| We have 593 people looking or searching right now. |
Premium Players
Moss and Coleman - The 'original' Solicitor from HELL
Daybells
Adams Harrison
Moss and Coleman
Bennetts Law Practice
Bolitho Way
Zecklers LLP
John Delaney & Co. Solicitors
EDC Lord & Co Solicitors
Irwin Mitchell Solicitors
Manches LLP
Swedbergs Advokatbyrå
WB Legal LLP Solicitors
Crane and Walton
3PB Barristers
Lester Aldridge Solicitors
Carter-Ruck
Khan Solicitors
Greenwoods Solicitors
Legal action to get listing removed by:
Bhatt Murphy Solicitors
Most ‘Shocking’
Alsters Kelley Solicitors
Zecklers LLP
Rubens Solicitors
Douglas Jones & Mercer
EDC LORD & CO SOLICTORS
Barnard & Co Solicitors
IBB Solicitors
Kirklands Solicitors
Kiteleys Solicitors
Grant Smith Law Practice
Colemans - CTTS Solicitors
Innes & MacKay Solicitors
Goldbergs Solicitors
FDC LAW
SMK Solicitors
Judges Section
Judge Sverre Erik Jebens at the ECHR
Abuser - Judge Agnar Arthur Nilsen Jr
Norwegiannaires Disease
Sexual chocolate and the Law in Norway
Pervert - Ingunn Røren
HOME ǀ SEARCH ǀ SUBMIT ǀ CONTACT US
|
||
|
This Directory is the first point of reference for complaints against solicitors. Enter a search term in the field below.
You can use full or part names, towns, counties etc.
|
Amphletts Solicitors | |||
| I arrived for my initial appointment, to find it was cancelled. The receptionist
stated that they' "did not have my phone number" despite my number being both on file, and on my headed notepaper, which I used to contact them well before the
appointment. They made no effort to contact me. A completely wasted journey and an inauspicious start. When I did manage to see someone some time later, I
was referred to as, "Mr Beresford", throughout the interview, which is not my surname. At this appointment a course of action was agreed upon. There followed a lengthy
period of inactive silence over the weeks that followed. Ipso facto, I sent Amphletts 2 emails, both of which went unacknowledged and unanswered. This was the
antitheses of their publicity material, which made much of "Keeping the client, informed". One line of reply, via email or letter, being beyond this firm's capability. The
course of action agreed upon was not carried out as promised. A letter to the opposing side's solicitor was not sent, rather, Mr Hind merely made a telephone call to the opposition's
solicitor (a female) during which he billed and cooed sweet nothings without defending my interests as vigourously as he had promised - he merely enjoyed a frolic and gambol, hand
in hand with the other solicitor, through the buttercup meadow, gaily scattering bills as they wended their jolly way home. This I deduce from the letter he sent me
as a result of this telephone call-a letter which defended THE OPPOSITION and made no reference to the bold action he had initially promised me. Further, the letter revealed that he
was on intimate, first name terms with my opponent, the other party.........yet at my interview he couldn't get MY name right....... Given the above, would you like te be represented
by this firm on, say, a murder charge? Solicitors are expensive as we all know, so my advice is, do NOT under any circumstances; employ this firm in any capacity whatsoever.
Do not waste your money, and, if receiving public funding, do NOT waste your time. I find this firm to be inept, slothful, arrogant, fumbling, craven and not fit for
purpose.
Rate this Solicitor: Have you had a problem with Amphletts Solicitors or Messrs Hind, Martin & Edmondson? Please let others know here: User Rating: | Print Version | Warn a friend |
|
|||